简介：　　【摘要】目的：探析追踪慢阻肺呼吸衰竭患者雾化吸入治疗中进行综合护理联合干预的应用效果。方法：進行治疗的慢阻肺患者中随机选取200例作为研究对象，随机分为两组（研究组和对照组），每组100例，对两组患者均进行雾化吸入治疗，研究组中的患者采用雾化吸入治疗结合综合护理干预的方法;对照组患者进行雾化吸入治疗后辅以常规护理，比较两组慢阻肺呼吸衰竭患者进行雾化吸入治疗护理的护理效果。结果：两组患者雾化吸入治疗护理均已完成，研究组100例患者有效率为高于对照组，具有统计学意义（P

简介：摘要：目的：探讨并分析用低剂量氨茶碱联合甲强龙对老年哮喘急性发作的护理体会。

简介：　　【摘要】 目的 研究支气管扩张患者行雾化吸入治疗的护理效果。方法 98例支气管扩张患者， 采取随机双盲法分为参照组与干预组， 每组 49例。两组患者均接受雾化吸入治疗， 参照组患者接受常规护理， 干预组患者在参照组基础上加入雾化吸入护理。对比两组患者的临床效果、护理满意度及干预前后临床症状评分。结果 干预组患者总有效率为 95.92%， 高于參照组的 77.55%， 差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。干预组患者护理满意度为 97.96%， 高于参照组的 81.63%， 差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。干预组干预前后临床症状评分分别为（ 35.67±4.21）、（ 12.34±2.15）分， 参照组患者干预前后临床症状评分分别为（ 36.09±4.52）、（ 20.18±3.72）分 ;干预前， 两组患者临床症状评分比较差异无统计学意义（ P>0.05） ;干预后， 干预组患者临床症状评分低于参照组， 差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。结论 支气管扩张行雾化吸入治疗并配合相应的护理能够有效改善患者的临床症状， 提升治疗效果， 并且改善护理满意度， 值得临床推广与应用。  　　【关键词】 支气管扩张 ;雾化吸入治疗 ;护理效果  [Abstract] Objective To study the nursing effect of atomization inhalation in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods 98 patients with bronchiectasis were randomly divided into control group and intervention group, 49 cases in each group. Two groups of patients received atomization inhalation treatment, the reference group received routine care, and the intervention group received atomization inhalation nursing on the basis of the reference group. The clinical effect, nursing satisfaction and clinical symptom scores before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results the total effective rate of the intervention group was 95.92%, higher than 77.55% of the reference group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the intervention group was 97.96%, which was higher than that of the reference group (81.63%) (P < 0.05). The clinical symptom scores of the intervention group before and after the intervention were (35.67 ± 4.21) and (12.34 ± 2.15) respectively, while those of the reference group were (36.09 ± 4.52) and (20.18 ± 3.72) respectively; before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the clinical symptom scores between the two groups (P > 0.05); After the intervention, the clinical symptom score of the intervention group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion bronchiectasis atomization inhalation treatment and corresponding nursing can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients, improve the treatment effect, and improve nursing satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.