简介:[1]AAMillward,JEMersey,2001.Conservationstrategiesforeffectivelandmanagementofprotectedareasusinganerosionpredictioninformationsystem(EPIS).JournalofEnvironmentalManagement,61:329-343.[2]BrianWood,2000.Roomfornature?ConservationmanagementoftheIsleofRumUKandprospectsforlargeprotectedareasinEurope.BiologicalConservation,94:93-105.[3]CesarCantu,RGeraldWright,JMichaelScottetal.,2004.AssessmentofcurrentandproposednaturereservesofMexicobasedontheircapacitytoprotectedgeophysicalfeaturesandbiodiversity.BiologicalConservation,115:411-417.[4]ChenShanghua,2003.AnimalresourceanditsfaunalcharacteristicsofCaiyangheNatureReserve.ForestInventoryandPlanning,28(1):32-36.(inChinese)[5]ChenYong,ZhuXingyu,ZhangZhiguang,2003.Thereviewofthesustainabledevelopmentfornaturereserves.JournalofNanjingForestryUniversity,27(2):79-83.(inChinese)[6]ChuiGuofa,WangXianpu,2000.Developingstatusandthetaskofnaturereservesintheworld.JournalofBeijingForestryUniversity,22(4):123-125.(inChinese)[7]DaiYumei,HanShijie,TangXiaomengetal.,2003.GeneticdiversityofFrankiainNoduleofAlnusinChangbaishanbyIGSPCR-RFLP.JournalofNortheastForestryUniversity,31(6):6-8.(inChinese)[8]DingDongsun,ZengZhijie,ChenChuanfa,2002.FaunaanalysisofinsectfromJiangxiJiulianshanNatureReserve.EntomologicalJournalofEastChina,11(2):10-18.(inChinese)[9]FangYunting,MoJiangming,SandraBrownetal.,2004.StorageanddistributionofsoilorganiccarboninDinghushanBiosphereReserve.ActaEcologicaSinica,24(1):135-142.(inChinese)[10]GeorgeVNPowell,JamesBarborak,MarioRodriguezS,2000.AssessingrepresentativenessofprotectednatureareasinCostaRicaforconservingbiodiversity:apreliminarygapanalysis.BiologicalConservation,93:35-41.[11]HanHairong,MaQinyan,NakayamaNorikazuetal.,2000.StudyonthegeneconservedstandofPinusTabu
简介:认为有必要在基于碳汇的土地利用和当地可持续发展之间建立一种更加明确的联系.依托一个中国-加拿大合作项目,以中国贵州省黎平县为例,阐述了一种将森林碳汇、森林资源管理以及如何促进当地可持续发展联系起来的综合评估方法,并且着重介绍了能帮助资源管理和规划部门实施这种综合评估的土地利用决策支持工具(LUDST).
简介:大庆市资源开发与湿地生态环境保护矛盾日益突出,通过对典型泡沼和排干水体采样监测,采用单因子指数法和综合污染指数法对大庆市油田开发区湿地水环境质量现状进行评价和污染特征分析。研究结果表明,按照水环境功能标准,在研究区,除了库里泡和排水干渠水质的综合评价污染强度为轻度、中度污染外,其余泡沼的水质均为重度或严重污染;但在单因素污染评价中,所有水体水质都为劣Ⅴ类。其中,各个泡沼水体都是化学需氧量、总磷和挥发酚3项指标超标,龙凤湿地的氮污染也比较严重,三永泡和中内泡水体石油污染物超标;而各个排干水体主要受氮和磷的污染。同时基于评价结果分析,提出了大庆市湿地生态系统污染综合防治对策。