简介: 【摘要】 目的 研究分析腰椎管狭窄患者接受舒适护理的临床效果。方法 80例腰椎管狭窄患者, 随机分为对照组和舒适组, 每组 40例。两组患者均采取椎弓根钉内固定 +减压 +椎间融合术, 后路腰椎椎体间融合( PLIF)术, 经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合( TLIF)术;对照组患者接受常规护理, 舒适组患者在对照组护理基础上加用了舒适护理。对两组的伤口疼痛、术后并发症发生情况及满意度进行比较分析。结果 两组患者均为未出现严重手术并发症, 舒适组患者的伤口疼痛率为 7.50%( 3/40), 对照组患者的伤口疼痛率为 22.50%( 9/40), 两组患者比较差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。舒适组患者发生脑脊液漏 2例, 脊髓神经功能受损 1例, 并发症发生率为 7.50%;对照组患者发生脑脊液漏 2例, 脊髓神经功能受损 3例, 并发症发生率为 12.50%;两组患者并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。舒适组患者的满意度为 97.50%( 39/40), 显著高于对照组的 80.00%( 32/40), 差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论 腰椎管狭窄患者接受舒适护理能够消除内心恐惧, 提升手术配合度, 降低不良反应发生几率, 改善护患关系, 临床应该推广使用。 【关键词】 腰椎椎管狭窄;舒适护理;围手术期 [Abstract] Objective To study and analyze the clinical effect of comfort nursing for patients with lumbar stenosis. Methods 80 patients with lumbar stenosis were randomly divided into control group and comfortable group, 40 cases in each group. The patients in both groups were treated with pedicle screw fixation + decompression + interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and lumbar interbody fusion through intervertebral foramen (TLIF). The patients in the control group received routine nursing, while the patients in the comfort group added comfort nursing on the basis of the nursing in the control group. The pain, complications and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results there were no serious surgical complications in the two groups, the pain rate of the comfortable group was 7.50% (3 / 40), the pain rate of the control group was 22.50% (9 / 40), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were 2 cases of CSF leakage and 1 case of spinal cord nerve function impairment in comfortable group, with a complication rate of 7.50%; 2 cases of CSF leakage and 3 cases of spinal cord nerve function impairment in control group, with a complication rate of 12.50%; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The satisfaction of comfort group was 97.50% (39 / 40), significantly higher than that of control group (80.00%) (32 / 40), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion comfortable nursing for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis can eliminate their inner fear, improve the cooperation degree of operation, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, and improve the relationship between nurses and patients.
简介:摘要目的研究腹腔镜与传统开腹形式记性胆囊炎的治疗临床效果。方法选取入院治疗的200例患有疾病胆囊炎的患者,作为有效的对比分析对象。其中100例采用腹腔镜下的胆囊切除手术方法,100例采用传统开腹胆囊切除手术的方法。对比两组患者术中的指标,分析切口长度,术中出血量、手术时间、术后引流量等。根据手术后的各项指标进行恢复,确定术后疼痛指标系数,记录术后的下床时间,术后的住院时间,对患者产生的并发症进行详细的记录。结果腹腔镜胆囊切除手术的治疗急性胆囊炎的术后各项指标显示,各项指标相比传统开腹胆囊切除手术具有良好的效果,患者切口长度、出血量、引流量、住院时间、下床时间等均比传统手术方式所用时间低。两组治疗方式之间的差异具有统计学意义P<0.05。术后患者各项指标均恢复正常,采用腹腔镜胆道切除手术的患者后续并发症较低。结果腹腔镜切除手术治疗患者胆囊炎具有良好的治疗效果,术后患者各项指标均恢复正常,腹腔镜切除术后患者产生的各种并发症较低。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除手术的治疗是一项安全的治疗手术方法,可以有效的实现临床急性胆囊炎症的有效治疗,具有良好的推广性治疗意义。
简介:摘要:目的:探讨快速康复护理在胸腔镜下肺结节切除术后患者中的效果及对疼痛的影响。方法:对我院2022年06月-2023年06月接受胸腔镜下肺结节切除术的患者进行研究,共计60例,经随机数字表法平均分组,对照组30例,开展常规护理,观察组30例,开展快速康复护理,就2组术后康复情况、疼痛程度展开比较。 结果:干预后观察组首次下床活动时间、胸管留置时间、肠鸣音恢复时间、住院时间较对照呈更低水平,均有明显差异(P <0.05);术后第一天、第三天观察组VAS评分比对照组更低,均有显著差异(P <0.05)。结论:对于胸腔镜下肺结节切除术患者,开展快速康复护理可缓解其术后疼痛情况,促进其尽快康复,值得临床大力应用。